Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 18:39:51 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems after PAO -> 2.2.5 stable Message-ID: <199711030139.SAA04709@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711030057.LAA00637@word.smith.net.au> References: <199711021912.UAA05459@gvr.gvr.org> <199711030057.LAA00637@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > > Unfortunately, it looks like it only supports IRQ 3 as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It also does 4. > > > > > > Not at sio1 according to the dumpcis output. > > > > Are your sure? Se 0c21 and 0x23 > > Remember chaps, the IRQ from the CIS is complete rubbish. PCCARDs > only have *one* interrupt pin; it's the routing in the pcic that does > the work. Yes, but the current FreeBSD code tells the driver/card that it's using the specific interrupt, so it doesn't always work correctly. We should tell the driver card that it's using an 'acceptable' interrupt, but use whatever one that is free, but we don't. (It's obvious that something is up with this when using the if_ep driver. If I use an 'acceptable' interrupt it works, but if I use a free but not specified interrupt the card doesn't work. :( ) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711030139.SAA04709>