Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 21:14:39 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Libretto 50 - US Version and PAO Message-ID: <199711050414.VAA16352@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711050309.NAA00694@word.smith.net.au> References: <199711041539.IAA13793@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199711050309.NAA00694@word.smith.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On that note, does it mean that any of the other information used in the > > CIS tuples (besides the size) is relevant? Couldn't we just determine > > the io size and map it anywhere then? It would *sure* be nice if we > > could simplify the CIS tuple processing. :) ;) > > Well, from my reading of things, yes; I can't actually see anything > that the card itself could actually be using to determine where it's > actually mapped. It sounds like the configuration entries are > basically junk there for the convenience of lazy DOS driver authors. Great. So, your re-write of pccardd should go much quicker now, right? *grin* Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711050414.VAA16352>