Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 23:57:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need some input re: named pipes Message-ID: <199711142357.QAA18184@usr06.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199711141434.JAA01323@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Nov 14, 97 09:33:59 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Could anyone give me some feedback on an idea of making our pipe code (fast) > used for named pipes? I don't think that it is hard to implement, but > do people usually use the socket ioctl's for named pipes? Many of those > would go-away when moving to the pipe code. Wouldn't this break X? Yes, I know I'm the one who's always trying to kill struct fileops... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711142357.QAA18184>