Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Nov 1997 22:35:06 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        chuckr@glue.umd.edu
Cc:        roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Partitioning suggestions?
Message-ID:  <199711180335.WAA00619@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <199711180211.VAA18014@earth.mat.net> from "chuckr@glue.umd.edu" at "Nov 17, 97 09:11:18 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
chuckr@glue.umd.edu said:
> 
> A friend who programs a lot shocked me by saying that she regularly
> installs just one big partition, for /,/usr/ the whole works.  I'd
> never done that myself, but I've been trying to come up with some solid
> reason why it's a bad idea.
> 
I have a huge number of partitions (usually use three per disk at the 4-8GB.)  The
only major things that I see is wrong with one big partition are some security
issues, and the inability to have a <nearly> read-only root.  I don't generally
like partitions less than 500MB for work space.

I'd actually like to look into a mini-root system, to virtually eliminate the
need for a fixit floppy.  That mini-root would not normally be mounted, but would
be there when you need it.  I sure wish that floppies were always 100MB :-).

-- 
John
dyson@freebsd.org
jdyson@nc.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711180335.WAA00619>