Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 14:19:28 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@wup.de> To: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pgcc ports Message-ID: <19971223141928.48178@wup.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971208185812.457E-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>; from Alex on Mon, Dec 08, 1997 at 09:11:45PM -0800 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971208185812.457E-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Should I remove pgcc completely ? We could try to make a new port egcs ... I think those people make the most success ... I think we can avoid a repository copy from pgcc-current for egcs, since it's a new port. Any other comments / wishes ? On Mon, Dec 08, 1997 at 09:11:45PM -0800, Alex wrote: > I've been mucking around and attempting to figure out why the pgcc port > doesn't seem to work very well (bombs out on the kernel compile). The > pgcc-devel port was marked broken, so I didn't use that. So I downloaded > the latest snapshot of egcs, compiled and built it (works fine for > everything, has some lesser probelms with the kernel). I got the pgcc > diffs for that and it worked beautifully. Perhaps you should remove the > pgcc port (or mark it incredibly broken), and update the pgcc-devel port, > as it works quite nicely, as long as one doesn't need to compile shared > libs. > > - alex -- Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH phone: +49 2173 3964 161 Support Unix - Andreas Klemm fax: +49 2173 3964 222 An der alten Ziegelei 2 mail1: andreas.klemm@wup.de D-40789 Monheim mail2: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971223141928.48178>