Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Dec 1997 19:55:12 +1030
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Martin Heller <mheller@student.uni-kl.de>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Moving CD audio data around with HP 4020i
Message-ID:  <19971225195512.18219@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.3.95.971224233128.45982A-100000@mater.student.uni-kl.de>; from Martin Heller on Wed, Dec 24, 1997 at 11:42:18PM %2B0100
References:  <19971224132149.33375@lemis.com> <Pine.A41.3.95.971224233128.45982A-100000@mater.student.uni-kl.de>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wed, Dec 24, 1997 at 11:42:18PM +0100, Martin Heller wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 1997, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 1997 at 08:05:53PM -0600, Daniel M. Eischen wrote:
>>>> Heh, I'll bet you $10 right now that I can send you an Audio CD
>>>> (transcribed from DAT) which you will *not* be able to duplicate
>>>> with your Solaris box. :-)
>>>
>>> Wait, I've got a buddy that's been trying to figure out how to read
>>> an audio DAT tape and write it to a CD audio track.  Is there a
>>> known solution???
>>
>> With enough effort, there's always a solution.
>
> Getting Audio data from a DAT is not trivial.
> To do this you need a special ROM on your
> DAT drive, SGI DATs are the only ones to have such a beast AFAIK.
> There is no known way around this problem - ever put a audio DAT
> tape into a DAT streamer ? 

Yup, and I've written data to them, too.

> my DAT doesnt like them and throws them out.

More modern DDS drives have a thing called MRS (Media Recognition
System), which causes them to reject cartridges which are incorrectly
coded, including a number of older data grade cartridges.  You can
disable this feature on most drives.  I don't know whether this is
sufficient to read DATs, however.

>>> I know he'd be *very* interested if there was, as he's been trying
>>> to figure it out for a few months (on and off).
>>
>> There's a lot more involved than just copying.  IIRC, CDs record at
>> 41.4 ksamples/second, and DATs record at 44 or 48 ksamples/second, so
>> you'd effectively have to remaster.  I suppose straight interpolation
>> would work, but it's still a lot of processing.
>
> I do not think that its so esay, but there are  programs for professionals
> who can do this.

Any comments on the difficulty, or the appropriateness of linear
interpolation?  Of course, you'd need to know the block format.

Merry Christmas
Greg


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971225195512.18219>