Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 15:49:14 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Now that Netscape can be packaged... Message-ID: <199801282349.PAA16477@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <199801282249.OAA14662@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> from Satoshi Asami at "Jan 28, 98 02:49:35 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Satoshi Asami: > * No big loss - Netscape GOLD is *ugly*. :-) > > Um, if ugliness is the issue, I can think of half dozen other ports > that I'd rather get rid of. :> > > Seriously, I've seen people use the "gold" version, and they seemed > to, um, enjoy it. (In what way, I wouldn't say.) If it's ok for > everyone, I'll split up the ports. > Brief question on this:: are we going to have netscape, v4 --gold or otherwise? Or the older v3.XX only? gary > -- Gary D. Kline kline@tao.thought.org Public service uNix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801282349.PAA16477>