Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 18:52:06 +0300 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> To: KATO Takenori <kato@migmatite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fat32 Message-ID: <199802141552.SAA01922@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Feb 1998 11:53:15 %2B0900." <19980214115315K.kato@gneiss.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
KATO Takenori wrote: > Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> wrote: > > > Now, could somebody please test this patch on PC98? MSDOSFS has some PC98 > > ifdefs, and I could occasionaly break the PC98 support. > > Very dirty PC98 code in msdosfs is used for 1024 bytes/sector floppy > disk, and it does not work in -current. It used 386BSD's B_XXX2 flag > but FreeBSD does not have such flag. It wasn't obvious for me. FreeBSD does not have B_XXX2 in <sys/buf.h>, but it has the flag in, for example, vfs_bio.c and pc98/pc98/fd.c. B_XXX2 == B_ORDERED, though. > > IMO, breakage of PC98 code in msdosfs has no problem, and 1024 > bytes/sector floppy support should be revised. I think, idea of a machide-dependent filesystem also should be revised. Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802141552.SAA01922>