Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 12:23:08 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: searle@longacre.demon.co.uk, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: need newer qt lib version for netscape-qt update Message-ID: <19980412122308.64737@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199804120905.CAA06975@bubble.didi.com>; from Satoshi Asami on Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 02:05:38AM -0700 References: <19980412102813.21776@klemm.gtn.com> <199804120905.CAA06975@bubble.didi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 02:05:38AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Hmm, so you expect with libqt as a moving target, that we soon > * might have to provide different versions of the lib because of > * possible incompatibilities ? > > Not necessarily. We might just decide to delete "qt" (version 1.3x) > when 1.4 comes out of beta. > > Either way, version numbers in a directory is a win. We have > countless examples of this (vim, gimp, tcl/tk, etc.), so please take > my word. ;) Ok. Currently I have a ready to commit libqt 1.33, which should be a stable version. Should we do a repository copy with it or simply bump the (-stable) 1.31 port ? What do you think ? The next round would be a rep copy for 1.39-snap or 1.40-snap ? I'm currently trying to find out, what's available. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980412122308.64737>