Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:56:25 -0400 (EDT) From: woods@zeus.leitch.com (Greg A. Woods) To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) Message-ID: <199804222056.QAA02964@brain.zeus.leitch.com> In-Reply-To: Mark Murray's message of "Wed, April 22, 1998 22:24:24 %2B0200" regarding "Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) " id <199804222024.WAA00701@greenpeace.grondar.za> References: <199804222024.WAA00701@greenpeace.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ On Wed, April 22, 1998 at 22:24:24 (+0200), Mark Murray wrote: ] > Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) > > Is my summary OK? If you're looking for a consensus, then no. ;-) (in certain circumstances I find any dynamic loading of code, be it through shared libraries, or run-time loading of .o's, or whatever, to be highly undesirable, and I think that's effectively what several other people have concluded too) -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <gwoods@acm.org> <robohack!woods> Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804222056.QAA02964>