Date: 28 Apr 1998 19:27:42 -0000 From: Jason Nordwick <nordwick@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU> To: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net> Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIGDANGER Message-ID: <19980428192742.1224.qmail@xcf.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: karl@mcs.net on 4/28/1998 to dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, witr@rwwa.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG <19980428073841.05698@mcs.net> References: <199804280030.UAA06099@spooky.rwwa.com> <199804280453.XAA03316@dyson.iquest.net> <19980428073841.05698@mcs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Karl Denninger, on Tue 4/28/1998, wrote the following: > > SIGDANGER is useful if properly trapped and handled. I'd like to see if > supported with the default to be "ignore" (ie: you have to ASK for it to > be delivered and processed). > Then it would almost always be ignored? Wouldn't this reqire patching almost every noncritical program? It would probably be easier just to patch a few important tools and find a Good(c) way to pick the unlucky process. jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980428192742.1224.qmail>