Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:46:26 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Cc: julian@whistle.com, kjc@csl.sony.co.jp, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: struct ifnet handling... Message-ID: <199805201046.MAA11746@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <19980520133843.32113@follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at May 20, 98 01:38:24 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I think it is only a matter of naming (witnessed by the "rule list" > > name used by cisco) and perhaps of having some default demux/mux of > > 'chains' (but that could give a loss of flexibility for no real > > performance advantage). > > I still don't see how you're loosing flexibility, even if you should > decide to provide this interface as an alternate interface for the > users. i was/am under the impression that you don't want to insert "SKIPTO" instructions in your filter, but rather provide fixes paths for the rules. if you provide SKIPTO instructions, then your proposal is a superset of what I and presumably Julian are talking about. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805201046.MAA11746>