Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 11:31:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: eivind@yes.no Cc: dcross1@mail.nycap.rr.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, dcross1@mail-atm.nycap.rr.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem resolutions... Message-ID: <199805221631.LAA22234@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <19980522130933.09755@follo.net> (message from Eivind Eklund on Fri, 22 May 1998 13:09:33 %2B0200) References: <3150.895815705@time.cdrom.com> <35655743.DF617E85@mail.nycap.rr.com> <19980522130933.09755@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>> was fixed by doing a make world first (I normally build the kernel >>>> first, then make world because >>> Just FYI, that's never been the correct order at any point in time, no >>> matter what others may have said. It is exactly backwards. >> Ok, maybe I am just being obtuse... (maybe I am just a Computer >> Scientist), but I need this >> explicitly said to me; what is the propper order for compiling? > First 'make world', then kernel. Almost always true. (There may be > specific cases where you should get away from the kernel because it eats > filesystems or something...) Why is that? I would expect some execs to depend on kernel features, not vice versa. Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805221631.LAA22234>