Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 21:49:31 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "Frank Pawlak" <fpawlak@execpc.com>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, jasone@canonware.com, smoergrd@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Microsoft's breaches of contract (was: FBSD license and multiple copyright holders) Message-ID: <199807110349.VAA28411@lariat.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <980706003906.ZM4836@darkstar.connect.com> References: <Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> <rx4ogv71jwn.fsf@oslo.geco-prakla.slb.com> <199807040703.BAA02533@softweyr.com> <19980704165817.D358@freebie.lemis.com> <grog@lemis.com> <980704165941.ZM2483@darkstar.connect.com> <19980705102445.L358@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Interestingly, the Microsoft Windows 95 implementations of a few TCP/IP utilities are said to have Berkeley copyright notices in the code, which means they're probably derived from FreeBSD utilities. Is Microsoft giving credit to the developers? If it isn't, it may be violating the Berkeley-style license and thus could be the target of a copyright lawsuit. Hmmm. Now there's an idea. Anyone care to research this? --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807110349.VAA28411>