Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 02:24:04 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro> Cc: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Pine 3.96/4.00 ports -- patches Message-ID: <19980713022404.A2811@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980713002145.3006A-100000@ady.warpnet.ro>; from ady@warpnet.ro on Mon, Jul 13, 1998 at 12:33:06AM %2B0300 References: <19980713011632.A1363@nagual.pp.ru> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980713002145.3006A-100000@ady.warpnet.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 13, 1998 at 12:33:06AM +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote: > > Without SPELLER defined Pico can't invoke _alternative_ speller when > > called from Pine as internal editor (special call, not equal to external > > editor). As I remember, it was something like ^T command (inactive without > > SPELLER defined). Please return SPELLER hack back. > > Yes, undefining SPELLER disables any spell checking capabilities in Pico > (and also Pine). > > Im am in favor of not disabling the spellchecker in any way; does it > bother you Pico having spellchecker ^T option ? Do you say that you prefer to leave dead key/ non-fuctional command in standalone Pico? I disagree at this point, this move leads at least to confusion. Generally it is bad Pine developers choice to give one option for two separate meanings. If you want to resolve this on permanent basis - contact them, on temporary basis my hack is well fit. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980713022404.A2811>