Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:29:56 -0700
From:      Ludwig Pummer <ludwigp@bigfoot.com>
To:        Donald Burr <dburr@pobox.com>, "Babylon (Ray)" <babylon@swcp.com>, FreeBSD Hardware <freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: Mother Board Chip Set question
Message-ID:  <199807201730.KAA06411@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.980720024550.dburr@pobox.com>
References:  <Pine.SUN.3.96.980720030706.559A-100000@boofura.swcp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:45 AM 7/20/98 -0700, Donald Burr wrote:
>The only problem with the 430TX is that it WILL NOT cache memory above the
>64 MB boundary.  Whether or not this will hurt your performance, really
>depends on how you use your machine.  For me, I could care less.
>---
>Donald Burr <dburr@pobox.com> - Ask me for my PGP key   | PGP: Your

Actually, it can, but only with a little help. On Asus TX chipset boards,
there is a small socket for a 'tag SRAM' chip which would allow all memory
to be cached (i think the board's max is 256MB).

--Ludwig Pummer
ludwigp@bigfoot.com ludwigp@chipweb.ml.org
ICQ UIN: 692441   http://chipweb.home.ml.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807201730.KAA06411>