Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 11:00:08 +0200 (MET DST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: Studded@dal.net (Studded) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is NATD / IPFW broke? Message-ID: <199809200900.LAA29934@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <3604DB82.418834FA@dal.net> from "Studded" at Sep 20, 98 03:39:43 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> While you're at it, IPFW on my fully up to date -Stable system is not > logging all the packets it should be. I haven't found a pattern to the > ones it doesn't log. This is with a configuration that's always worked > in the past. what do you expect me to do with this kind of bug report ? it is too vague to let me do anything... i need at least one case to reproduce the problem. (there _is_ in fact one subtle diffetence, that i am fixing, in the ipfw behaviour: if you SKIPTO a non existant rule, the default behaviour was to go to the next one whereas with my mods i jump to the default rule. I used an == instead of >= in one test...) are you hitting that case by chance ? cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809200900.LAA29934>