Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 17:44:02 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, mike@smith.net.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, dmaddox@scsn.net Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h? Message-ID: <199810050744.RAA01962@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> `includes' is a private target in src/Makefile for installing [all] the >> includes. > >It isn't, and has not been for years. It might be meant to, which is a >different matter entirely. It's also broken by design (includes should >live with the code they describe). It's whatever the Makefile experts say it is. ---------------------------- revision 1.139 date: 1997/08/21 15:43:54; author: bde; state: Exp; lines: +8 -1 Added directories in the includes target so that it installs everything that a full install would (modulo bugs in rpcsvc/Makefile). The missing things weren't used (except for mp.h from libmp), but there are relatively few of them and it's easier to be complete. ---------------------------- Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810050744.RAA01962>