Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 15:21:55 -0700 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth <shocking@prth.pgs.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone tried an IBM 3590 tape drive? Message-ID: <199810222221.PAA17059@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth <shocking@prth.pgs.com> "Anyone tried an IBM 3590 tape drive?" (Oct 8, 11:06am)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 8, 11:06am, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote: } Subject: Anyone tried an IBM 3590 tape drive? } They're a differential SCSI device, rather large in size and run to about } 15-20GB. We use them here for seismic data. On a related note, what } differential SCSI controllers have people had luck with? My impression is that seismic data is typically recorded with very large record sizes (like a megabyte?). I think the current limit in FreeBSD is 64K. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810222221.PAA17059>