Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 14:46:49 -0500 From: "John C. Place" <placej@ka3tis.com> To: hackers@freebsd.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: scanf in the kernel? Message-ID: <19981031144649.A278@ka3tis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981030102422.27452F-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>; from Bill Fumerola on Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 10:25:39AM -0500 References: <199810300813.AAA01726@dingo.cdrom.com> <Pine.HPP.3.96.981030102422.27452F-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 10:25:39AM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: > I'm not a kernel-hacking kind of guy, but I know just from personal C > experiences that scanf makes things a lot easier to change later on and > easier to get a visual representation of. scanf and sprintf have become my > friend. > I am not one either but I thought the *printf commands are very expensive (to the processer) and something as low level as the kernel would one try to avoid these??? John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981031144649.A278>