Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 07:25:47 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt Makefile ports/x11-toolkits/qt133 Makefile Message-ID: <19981112072547.A18915@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199811112344.PAA17083@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 03:44:23PM -0800 References: <19981111222924.A2671@klemm.gtn.com> <199811112344.PAA17083@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 03:44:23PM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Yes, and then a respository copy from qt140 to qt141 ;-) > > You want a *what*? ;) > > After the latest qt and gtk debacle, I'm very weary of allowing > another qt version in the tree. I have a few questions I need to ask > you first: >From the website: Version 1.41 adds several corrections, bug-fixes and minor extensions to Qt version 1.40. For details, please see the Qt Changes pages. http://www.troll.no/changes/ > (1) Is qt141 upwards compatible to qt140? In other words, can I > change the USE_QT define in bsd.port.mk, cvs remove qt140 (in > other words, this is a straght upgrade, with the repository copy > only necessary because of the name change) and will the entire > world be happy? > > (2) If not, how hard do you think is it to fix all the ports that > don't work with qt141? Can't say it ... only possibility to test it is to make the 1.41 port, and every maintainer locally changes USE_QT to the new version and lets see... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981112072547.A18915>