Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Nov 1998 06:52:40 -0800
From:      Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
To:        Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org>
Cc:        oortiz@LCSI.COM, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Intruder Lockout 
Message-ID:  <199811131452.GAA15069@cwsys.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Nov 1998 15:29:35 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.981111152714.1143B-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.981111152714.1143B-100000@fledge.watson.org>, 
Robert
Watson writes:
> 
> I have always found the lockout behavior of some operating systems a
> little upsetting; the opportunity for denying service is quite large,
> especially to the administrator.  On the other hand, the excluding the
> administrator from lockout behavior of NT doesn't seem desirable quite
> right either :).  Besides which, suppose someone enters the wrong password
> in the POP or IMAP mail reader -- it may retry the connection several
> times (if set to check mail often) before the user notices, and lockout
> can occur quickly in that kind of situation.
> 
> Probably the best solution is to enforce better passwords, or use of
> PK-based authentication.  Or one-time passwords.

How about Kerberos?  FreeBSD comes with Kerberos IV and there is a 
Kerberos V port in the ports collection.


Regards,                       Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                      Fax:  (250)387-5766
Open Systems Group          Internet:  cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca
ITSD                                   Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca
Government of BC            




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811131452.GAA15069>