Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:55:01 -0500
From:      "Larry S. Marso" <larry@marso.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Proposal: afterstep/windowmaker categories
Message-ID:  <19981217095500.I15104@marso.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9812180003070.5549-100000@bragg>; from Kris Kennaway on Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 12:06:42AM %2B1030
References:  <Pine.OSF.4.05.9812180003070.5549-100000@bragg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At some point, does it make sense to include a subdirectory "symbolic",
that, e.g., links to wm docking apps without requiring we pull them out of
the most directly descriptive directory?

Best regards
-- 
Larry S. Marso
larry@marso.com



On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 12:06:42AM +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> There are a proliferation of applications being created for the afterstep and
> windowmaker WMs (most of them "dockable" with the icon bar). Many of these are
> already ports, and I'm planning to submit ports for some of the others (as
> well as an update to the afterstep port itself, once I hear back from the
> maintainer).
> 
> It would be good if there was some way to identify these from other types of X
> utilities - how about adding the new virtual categories "afterstep" and
> "windowmaker" (we already have "kde")?
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Kris
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981217095500.I15104>