Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:55:01 -0500 From: "Larry S. Marso" <larry@marso.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal: afterstep/windowmaker categories Message-ID: <19981217095500.I15104@marso.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9812180003070.5549-100000@bragg>; from Kris Kennaway on Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 12:06:42AM %2B1030 References: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9812180003070.5549-100000@bragg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At some point, does it make sense to include a subdirectory "symbolic", that, e.g., links to wm docking apps without requiring we pull them out of the most directly descriptive directory? Best regards -- Larry S. Marso larry@marso.com On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 12:06:42AM +1030, Kris Kennaway wrote: > There are a proliferation of applications being created for the afterstep and > windowmaker WMs (most of them "dockable" with the icon bar). Many of these are > already ports, and I'm planning to submit ports for some of the others (as > well as an update to the afterstep port itself, once I hear back from the > maintainer). > > It would be good if there was some way to identify these from other types of X > utilities - how about adding the new virtual categories "afterstep" and > "windowmaker" (we already have "kde")? > > Any thoughts? > > Kris > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981217095500.I15104>