Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:00:10 -0800 (PST) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG> To: donegan@quick.net Cc: mark@grondar.za, scrappy@hub.org, dcs@newsguy.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. Message-ID: <199812311700.JAA20011@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.981231082907.26431F-100000@oldnews.quick.net> (donegan@quick.net) References: <Pine.BSI.3.91.981231082907.26431F-100000@oldnews.quick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:41:33 -0800 (PST) > From: "Steven P. Donegan" <donegan@quick.net> > > A possible plus for the (I think) minority where sendmail poses any > performance issues - I found sendmail to be quite capable of a hundred > thousand or so transactions per hour - for the few who need more - make > it a port - not the default... rob kolstad found sendmail to be limited to 120k emails per hour (eph?). its in a LISA paper he did recently. see www.usenix.org. moving mailing list delivery from sendmail to postfix has resulted in noticeably faster service at lower loads and less memory usage. can you tell me about the sendmail configuration you are referencing? jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812311700.JAA20011>