Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:36:32 -0800 (PST)
From:      David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Error in vm_fault change
Message-ID:  <199901262036.MAA08253@pau-amma.whistle.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990126150352.27963B-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:06:54 -0500 (EST)
>From: Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org>

>I.e., today it's a realtime machine, tomorrow it's a single-user
>workstation, the next day a heavily loaded timesharing machine with CPU
>time partitioning.

I can see a value to this ability....

Back when I was an MVS (IBM mainframe) systems programmer, it wasn't
uncommon for a machine to be set up to have differing SRM (? "System
Resource Manager" seems to strike a resonant chord in my memory)
"objective curves" depending on the expected workload, which would often
vary depending on time-of-day:  for example, during the day, the system
would be weighted to favor interactive processes, while at night, it
would switch to more of a batch mode of operation (for back-office
file-crunching).

Although the range of work handled reasonably adequately by modern UNIX
systems is pretty awesome, the ability to favor one type of workload
over another can give a sysadmin another "knob" to twist -- and it may
merely be used more on a per-site basis than on a time-of-day basis, but
it would be rather silly to assume that everyone's workload is the same.

The boxes I'm responsible for here, for example, aren't under the kind
of load (qualitatively or quantitatively) that the shellN boxes at BEST
(Hi, Matt!) are, for example.  (I consider this A Good Thing.)  And the
workload of one box may well differ from that of another; this is
intentional.

david
-- 
David Wolfskill		UNIX System Administrator
dhw@whistle.com		voice: (650) 577-7158	pager: (650) 371-4621

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901262036.MAA08253>