Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:38:52 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
Cc:        nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)
Message-ID:  <199901290138.RAA16433@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <199901290056.QAA07338@bubba.whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Yes, that's true... but on balance I (personally) find it's worth
:the tradeoff.
:
:On the other hand, I can't stand the GNU coding style..
:
:-Archie
:
:___________________________________________________________________________
:Archie Cobbs   *   Whistle Communications, Inc.  *   http://www.whistle.com

    Well, not to start a flame war, but I happen to like GCC's choices
    for warnings with -Wall.  They aren't all that bad, really... they
    warn you if you have an assignment in a boolean statement like:
    if (a = b) because it is a *very* common mistake to intend '==' rather
    then '='.  I found a couple of those when I turned it on the kernel
    tree, for example.  

    I used to use assignments in condtionals all the time myself, until one
    day it bit so hard it took 30 hours to find the bug - which turned out
    to be an assignment in a conditional that was supposed to be an ==.  From
    that day on, I never put assignments in conditionals with an explicit
    boolean test, aka if ((a = b) != 0) { ... }.

    Beyond that it's pretty much just &/| and &&/|| precedences.  I personally
    *never* liked the fact that C gave & and | ( and && and || ) differentl
    precedences.  IMHO, the arithmatic-vs-shift parenthesization is something
    I've *always* done myself, so I don't mind those warnings either.

    -Wall also turns on -Wswitch which warns of switch()'d on enumerated types
    which lack a default.

    All the remaining warnings that -Wall turns on are pretty standard -
    for example, weak-typing warnings.  I advocate prototyping and relatively
    strong typing myself.  Weak typing warnings are a good thing.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901290138.RAA16433>