Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 02:32:50 -0800 (PST) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: subdirectory sizes on wcarchive Message-ID: <199902221032.CAA25472@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990221235602R.arnej@stud.math.ntnu.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: arnej@math.ntnu.no * Pretty useful: * * eufrat:/pub/FreeBSD:$ grep packages du.out * 993108 ./ports/i386/packages-2.2-stable The last 2.2-stable snapshot, will have to stay for a loooooong time (if we were to believe the moaning from people when I announced it :). * 829852 ./ports/i386/packages-3.0-aout The last 3.0-aout snapshot. Don't know how long we should keep these (they're pretty old too). * 921916 ./ports/i386/packages-2.2.7 * 618100 ./ports/i386/packages-3.0 Can go. * Do we really need all these? I'd say that the 2.2.7 tree could * be zapped at once, and the 3.0 trees pretty soon - we want to * encourage users to upgrade to 3.1, right? I usually zap packages-<foo> when <foo>-RELEASE is gone from the releases directory. (Otherwise those who install those releases will get an error.) Jordan, how about deleting 2.2.7 and 3.0? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902221032.CAA25472>