Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:10:53 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: Thomas Dean <tomdean@ix.netcom.com>, mark@grondar.za, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: egcs and gcc Message-ID: <19990301181053.A11564@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903011951380.339-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 07:53:07PM -0500 References: <199903020042.QAA57349@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903011951380.339-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> .if defined(WANT_SHAREDLIBS) > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-shared > .endif > > in it. That's not particularly friendly, I wonder why it was put in > there, unless the feature is somehow broken? I'm trying to rebuild it > now to see what it then installs. Because people like a previous poster thinks that eg++ should like against /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2 which is plain WRONG. eg++ is totally incompatable with g++ 2.7.x. So what happens when you move an eg++ produced binary to a machine that doesn't have EGCS installed? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990301181053.A11564>