Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:09:34 -0300 (GMT)
From:      Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar>
To:        robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org
Cc:        wes@softweyr.com, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, andrewr@slack.net, archie@whistle.com, andrew@squiz.co.nz, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: disapointing security architecture
Message-ID:  <199903121509.MAA19155@ns1.sminter.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990312094955.6494T-100000@fledge.watson.org> from Robert Watson at "Mar 12, 99 09:56:24 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
En un mensaje anterior, Robert Watson escribió:
[...]
> The Solaris folk now appear to have ACL support in the base OS install +
> FS.  Where did they find the space to store the ACLs?  Adding any more

I think they store it sacrificing 3rd. level indirection, but I'm not sure.


Fernando P. Schapachnik
Administracion de la red
VIA Net Works Argentina SA


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903121509.MAA19155>