Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:18:37 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@ints.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: disapointing security architecture
Message-ID:  <199903121818.KAA78126@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903122015550.91667-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> :> Here's an idea.. FreeBSD could pay for a 3rd party security audit
:> :> of a stock FreeBSD system. Peter Shipley did this for Whistle
:> :> and the InterJet (a "black box" approach). No problems were found
:> :> but it was good to know that :-)
:> :This is a joke, right?
:>     It would be hillarious if we could get a C2 certification for a base
:>     GENERIC system.
:With posix.1e fully implemented it should get B2 ;-) but who will pay for
:sertification???

    How much does certification cost?

					-Matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903121818.KAA78126>