Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 07:45:10 -0800 (PST) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami) To: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au Cc: gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov, taoka@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules Message-ID: <199904011545.HAA55582@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904020104270.20365-100000@bragg> (message from Kris Kennaway on Fri, 2 Apr 1999 01:07:35 %2B0930 (CST)) References: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904020104270.20365-100000@bragg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> * On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Glenn Johnson wrote: * * > I would think this should go in ports/biology. * * ports/chemistry would be better suited, if it existed. There's not very much I don't mind have a ports/chemistry except there appears to be a fair amount of overlap between it and biology. * in biology - perhaps we should move them to a new 'scientific' category and * have 'biology', 'chemistry', 'physics', etc as virtuals (as appropriate). * We're not likely to have all that many ports in each of the categories, but it * beats misfiling them :) The only problem is that "scientific" would include (at least) math. I wish there's a good word that just covers the three fields you mentioned. -W To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904011545.HAA55582>