Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Apr 1999 07:45:10 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami)
To:        kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au
Cc:        gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov, taoka@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules
Message-ID:  <199904011545.HAA55582@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904020104270.20365-100000@bragg> (message from Kris Kennaway on Fri, 2 Apr 1999 01:07:35 %2B0930 (CST))
References:   <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904020104270.20365-100000@bragg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>

 * On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Glenn Johnson wrote:
 * 
 * > I would think this should go in ports/biology.
 * 
 * ports/chemistry would be better suited, if it existed. There's not very much

I don't mind have a ports/chemistry except there appears to be a fair
amount of overlap between it and biology.

 * in biology - perhaps we should move them to a new 'scientific' category and
 * have 'biology', 'chemistry', 'physics', etc as virtuals (as appropriate).
 * We're not likely to have all that many ports in each of the categories, but it
 * beats misfiling them :)

The only problem is that "scientific" would include (at least) math.
I wish there's a good word that just covers the three fields you
mentioned.

-W


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904011545.HAA55582>