Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 22:19:41 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os Message-ID: <19990407221941.A91075@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <370B84A4.3818F8A@newsguy.com>; from dcs@newsguy.com on Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 01:15:32AM %2B0900 References: <19990407193627.A68829@nagual.pp.ru> <370B84A4.3818F8A@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 01:15:32AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > > > Now /sys/boot can't be compiled with gcc due to non-existent -Os added. > > Is it intentional or can be removed for backward compatibility? > > It can be removed for backward compatibility. What it does is > produce a smaller code. Egcs needs it, gcc doesn't. The problem is deeper. When I reemove it, I got this error: -2100 bytes available it seems that boot2 needs to be reduced, and I don't know why it becomes that big and what can be reduced. First candidates are static cmd[512] and kernel[1024]. Please fix so it can be still compiled with gcc. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990407221941.A91075>