Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:20:02 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@anasazi.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Year 2000 Message-ID: <199904192120.OAA08822@chad.anasazi.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The computer industry seems to have shortened "Year 2000" to "Y2K". Isn't that the kind of thinking that got us into this mess in the first place? Being that as it may, we've got quite a number of 2.2-STABLE servers in production, and a small number of 3.1-STABLE cooking on the back burner. We've been asked by some customers if we have done any formal Y2K certification testing. The answer is that we haven't, although it is scheduled for right after the Linux testing completes. But it did make me wonder if the FreeBSD organization, or any of y'all out there have so done (and if so, what the outcome was). I'd expect sore spots in the locale stuff, perhaps in process accounting. I'll be happy to post what we learn, although I doubt our tests will be exhaustive. We'll just be testing how the platform supports our particular set of applications. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) REZsolutions, Inc. 602-870-3330 chad@REZsolutions.com chad@anasazi.com chad@dcfinc.com 7500 North Dreamy Draw Drive, Suite 120, Phoenix, Az 85020 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904192120.OAA08822>