Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 10:35:14 +0200 From: Andreas Braukmann <braukmann@tse-online.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Subject: Re: just pulled the egcs-switch Message-ID: <19990507103514.B457@paert.tse-online.de> In-Reply-To: <199905070810.BAA26647@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Fri, May 07, 1999 at 01:10:31AM -0700 References: <19990507094730.A457@paert.tse-online.de> <199905070810.BAA26647@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 01:10:31AM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Is not a good idea to use the default egcs as it is configured to compile > c++ programs which use threads and exceptions for instance Netscape's > Eletrical Fire (A Java VM/Compiler) does not work. do you suggest to use the egcs from the ports collection as the 'more-or-less' default compiler for the ports? I've used the beast for a few c++ applications (from ports and various other sources), which needed the more advanced c++-compiler than gcc 2.7.x. But then I have '2 different compilers' and '2 different set of libs', again, havn't I? -Andreas -- : Anti-Spam Petition: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ : : PGP-Key: http://www.tse-online.de/~ab/public-key : : Key fingerprint: 12 13 EF BC 22 DD F4 B6 3C 25 C9 06 DC D3 45 9B : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990507103514.B457>