Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:07:04 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: alla@sovlink.ru (Alla Bezroutchko) Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Syslog alternatives? Message-ID: <199907090707.RAA16350@cheops.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <37859B74.7528C158@sovlink.ru> from "Alla Bezroutchko" at Jul 9, 99 10:49:24 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Alla Bezroutchko, sie said: > > This is not exactly FreeBSD security question. More like general > Unix security. Hope it is not completely off topic. > > I was looking at several syslogd alternatives (BTW, I don't think > I have a complete list, can you suggest something?) and found out > that I don't understand what is wrong with traditional syslogd from > security standpoint. > > Could someone explain me or point me to some resources that explain > why syslogd is bad? Prove to me that your log files have any integrity, in such a way that I cannot dispute it. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907090707.RAA16350>