Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 19:04:35 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org Cc: proff@suburbia.net, imp@village.org, alla@sovlink.ru, avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Syslog alternatives? Message-ID: <199907110904.TAA01620@cheops.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990709124340.24202L-100000@fledge.watson.org> from "Robert Watson" at Jul 9, 99 12:45:32 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Robert Watson, sie said: [...] > I still lean towards a combination of existing securelevel code, and a > protected process flag indicating that the process may not be intefered > with by unauthorized userland code (i.e., no debugging, signaling, etc). That can be used to solve a suite of different problems. Interesting idea, none the less. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907110904.TAA01620>