Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Jul 1999 19:04:35 +1000 (EST)
From:      Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
To:        robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org
Cc:        proff@suburbia.net, imp@village.org, alla@sovlink.ru, avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Syslog alternatives?
Message-ID:  <199907110904.TAA01620@cheops.anu.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990709124340.24202L-100000@fledge.watson.org> from "Robert Watson" at Jul 9, 99 12:45:32 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Robert Watson, sie said:
[...]
> I still lean towards a combination of existing securelevel code, and a
> protected process flag indicating that the process may not be intefered
> with by unauthorized userland code (i.e., no debugging, signaling, etc).

That can be used to solve a suite of different problems.  Interesting idea,
none the less.

Darren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907110904.TAA01620>