Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 10:13:06 +0900 (JST) From: hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: imp@village.org, nate@mt.sri.com, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd change for "cardio" and "cardmem" Message-ID: <199907220113.KAA11511@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Jul 1999 09:33:30 JST". <199907220033.RAA02886@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199907220033.RAA02886@dingo.cdrom.com> mike@smith.net.au writes: >> And of course they should be >> >> config default sio any >> cardio 8 >> >> ie. "use the sio driver", not "be sio4". I agree (but it needs patches for /dev/card?'s ioctl). >> I think "cardio" is a bad >> name for the keyword too; I would use the same keyword that's used for >> specifying a fixed I/O address but use a notation signifying an >> arbitrary multiple, eg. >> >> ioport %8 I also agree with it. This seems better than "cardio". Explicit I/O location is only needed for hardwired driver code. I'll rewrite my patch soon. By the way, to be "arbitrary multiple" is not important in resource allocation for PC-cards. The size of I/O window is essential. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi Assistant Manager Information Technology Center, Keio University <hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907220113.KAA11511>