Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 17:54:29 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA <yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Patch for Alpha/AXP Message-ID: <199907240854.RAA19619@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 24 Jul 1999 04:37:24 -0400." <86208.932805444@noop.colo.erols.net> References: <86208.932805444@noop.colo.erols.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I am afraid this is not quite right. >> >> Bruce, Doug and I are currently in discussion to fix this. > >Hrm. Why does the AXP cons.c track udev_t while the x86 verson >doesn't? As best as I can tell, the AXP doesn't seem to need it any >more than the x86 does, unless I've missed something. As dev_t is now a struct, we cannot track dev_t for SYSCTL. It has to be udev_t. sys/i386/i386/cons.c should be doing the same as the alpha version, rather than vice versa. To quote Bruce: "alpha/alpha/cons.c should be identical with i386/i386/cons.c and not in a machine-dependent place. All current differences are bugs" :-) Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907240854.RAA19619>