Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:51:31 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away Message-ID: <199908212051.OAA48584@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 16:31:04 EDT." <199908212031.QAA12995@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <199908212031.QAA12995@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <199908210701.BAA41654@harmony.village.org> <199908211951.MAA00837@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199908212031.QAA12995@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett Wollman writes: : You missed the point. The bus hierarchy has support designed-in to : pass power-management requests down the device tree. The only : functions which should be registering themselves with APM directly : are: : : 1) Old device drivers using a compatibility shim, or : : 2) Kernel code which is not a device driver. : : If you need more functionality than DEVICE_SUSPEND and DEVICE_RESUME, : then add more methods. That DEVICE_SUSPEND and DEVICE_RESUME methods are exactly the same thing as we have right now with the apm code. No need to reinvent the wheel here. It was on my list of cleanups to do after I got the pccard stuff to the point where modems work again. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908212051.OAA48584>