Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:02:42 -0700 From: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@home.net> To: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc back? Message-ID: <19990822130242.A23957@norn.ca.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9908221505310.14157-100000@rac1.wam.umd.edu>; from Kenneth Wayne Culver on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400 References: <199908221745.KAA07014@dingo.cdrom.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.9908221505310.14157-100000@rac1.wam.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > > I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that
> > > gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to
> > > keep gcc in the source now.
> >
> > If you are tracking -current, you should be reading the commit messages.
> >
> > egcs has become gcc.
>
> I must have accidentally missed that one. Especially since egcs is still
> in my source tree after cvsupping.
There wasn't one. At least not here. I remember when egcs was imported
it was the same thing.
-Chris
--
cpiazza@home.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org
"It's better to be quotable than to be honest."
--Tom Stoppard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990822130242.A23957>