Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Aug 1999 17:50:59 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Luoqi Chen <luoqi@watermarkgroup.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
Subject:   Re: Panic with NFSv3 on a CURRENT/SMP system
Message-ID:  <19990822175059.H14964@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199908220230.WAA08616@lor.watermarkgroup.com>; from Luoqi Chen on Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 10:30:54PM -0400
References:  <199908220230.WAA08616@lor.watermarkgroup.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 21 August 1999 at 22:30:54 -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
>> I'm generating a core dump. Please note that as tara is my test machine, I use
>> "INVARIANT" & "INVARIANT_SUPPORT". Should I remove them ?
>>
>> It seems that from my reading of the code, the panic would not had happened
>> without INVARIANT.
>
> It is these options that caused the panic, you either remove them from the
> kernel proper, or compile the kld with them.

In all likelihood, these options didn't "cause" the panic, they just
made another bug more visible.  That's what they're there for.

Greg
--
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990822175059.H14964>