Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 16:47:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, mmuir@es.co.nz, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: followup to apm problems. Message-ID: <199909012247.QAA20600@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Sep 1999 09:45:38 EDT." <199909011345.JAA05781@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <199909011345.JAA05781@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <199908312120.PAA13660@harmony.village.org> <199908312216.PAA00882@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199909011345.JAA05781@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett Wollman writes: : And designs based on the Intel PIIX4 will generate SMI# interrupts for : whichever activities are programmed in the BIOS, completely bypassing : the traditional interrupt mechanism. So does that mean if we do disable them at the PIC level we'll be OK? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909012247.QAA20600>