Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 19:59:05 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changes to binutils (--target=alpha-freebsd) Message-ID: <199909040159.TAA61964@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 Sep 1999 18:41:27 PDT." <199909040141.SAA10170@vashon.polstra.com> References: <199909040141.SAA10170@vashon.polstra.com> <87iu5rbkvv.fsf@redmail.netbsd.org> <199909020816.QAA19052@laurasia.com.au> <199909032310.RAA48427@harmony.village.org> <199909040016.SAA48672@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199909040141.SAA10170@vashon.polstra.com> John Polstra writes: : I don't know about binutils. But there was a 32->64 bit cross : compilation bug for the Alphas in gcc for a long time -- up until : around the time of egcs 1.1.2. It wasn't present in old gccs, but it : got re-introduced at some point. Does that mean it is still present? : Once I fixed that, I was able to cross-bootstrap Modula-3 from an i386 : to an Alpha. (Modula-3 uses the gcc back end, slightly modified.) Well then. Time to crank up the make to see if I've been informed incorrectly.... I do know there may be several binaries that may need to be built that might not work out right.... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909040159.TAA61964>