Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:07:22 -0700 From: Michael Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.3-RELEASE RELNOTES.TXT Message-ID: <19990917000722.B67426@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909162033330.1881-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from Bill Fumerola on Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 08:34:11PM -0400 References: <4.1.19990916213429.05c081e0@granite.sentex.ca> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909162033330.1881-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 08:34:11PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > ------------ > > The proftpd port has been updated with the latest patches to prevent > > possible remote root exploits. > > ------------ > > > > Was it not marked 'unsafe' instead ? > > FORBIDDEN, I thought. The buzz on BUGTRAQ is that no version of proftpd > is safe still, and exploits are on the way. The port was updated and then more security holes were found. And I have a updated local copy and even more security holes were found. In theory a new proftpd release will be out tomorrow or the next day with all the holes patched, including the holes mentioned on BUGTRAQ. Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990917000722.B67426>