Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:19:45 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 on 3.2 STABLE ? Message-ID: <19990922001945.A67272@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <37E73063.8AD59A0D@comptel.com> References: <37E73063.8AD59A0D@comptel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to stefan parvu: > I was curious about one fact: on <netinet/in.h> there is no any in6_addr > support for IPv6. Am I wrong ? FreeBSD does not support IPv6 ? Our Japanese friends are working to integrate IPv6 into current. For -STABLE, you have at least 3 implementations that works fairly well (although I've tried only the first two): - KAME IPv6 (with IPsec and soon Mobile/IPv6) <http://www.kame.net/>; This is the one that will be in CURRENT. I use it on 3.1 and it is my connection to the 6BONE. - INRIA IPv6 (with authentication part of IPsec and Mobile/IPv6) <ftp://ftp.inria.fr/network/ipv6/>; Works fine, especially with mobility. - NRL IPv6 / IPsec. I haven't tried it but I heard it works well. NetBSD & OpenBSD has decided to use one of the last two for themselves (although I always forgot who took what -- I think NetBSD took INRIA and OpenBSD NRL but I could be wrong). KAME will become the unified-IPv6 for *BSD. One of the goals for 4.0 _is_ having IPv6 as standard. For -STABLE it is very easy to get and install it. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990922001945.A67272>