Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 17:05:27 -0500 From: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> To: Pascal Hofstee <daeron@Wit401305.student.utwente.nl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: module names Message-ID: <19991025170527.K452@holly.calldei.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9910252351330.17264-100000@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl> References: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9910252351330.17264-100000@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > Hi, > > With the recent addition of more and more KLDs to the /modules directory i > was wondering if perhaps it would be a good idea to name these modules > more consistantly: > > if_* : For all network modules (done already) > ng_* : For all netgraph related modules (done already) > fs_* : For all filesystem modules > saver_* : For all screensavers (probably would prefer a shorter prefix) > emu_* : For binary compatibilty modules like linux/ibcs2/svr4 I agree with the idea but some of the name ideas are a little off. What would Vinum go under? I also disagree with your usage of ``emu_''. I would prefer ``compat_''. -- |Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> |If at first you don't succeed, you must be a programmer. `-------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991025170527.K452>