Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 11:13:15 -0400 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: J McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WYSIWYG word processor needed Message-ID: <19991026111315.30516@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9910261532040.81010-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from J McKitrick on Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 03:34:02PM %2B0100 References: <19991025094534.54267@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9910261532040.81010-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 26 October 1999 at 15:34:02 +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > The only problem with Non-GUI wp's is trying to get a WYSIWYG view of the > document. Well, there are other problems too. But why do you want a WYSIWYG view? I take a WYG view of my stuff, and it works fine. > But of course, this means large appps and more bugs. On the other > hand, I have no experience with typesetting, but i have no desire to > go back to the old style of imbedded invisible control codes to > format text. Is there a good choice that falls somewhere in > between? Well, the invisible control codes were the worst of both worlds. I've only seen them with things like Word Star, early versions of Word Perfect, and Sprint. Control information should be visible and intelligible. TeX codes are visible but not intelligible. SGML codes are visible and, once you've learnt 5 layers of abstractions, intelligible. Personally I prefer [gt]roff, which falls somewhere in between. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991026111315.30516>