Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 01:08:37 +0100 From: "H. Eckert" <ripley@nostromo.in-berlin.de> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Message-ID: <19991111010837.C48604@server.nostromo.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <19991110000004.A37063@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 12:00:04AM %2B0100 References: <199911090824.KAA90295@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <22398.942136151@critter.freebsd.dk> <19991110000004.A37063@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Ollivier Robert (roberto@keltia.freenix.fr): > - the larger address space enables one to avoid the NAT abomination, Actually I like the fact very much that I can put my other machines behind my NAT gateway and have them not exposed too much into the public side of the network. If my gateway host was just a network media translator (as in ISDN to ethernet router) and the other machines had real IP's, they would be easibly addressable from the outside. Greetings, Ripley -- H. Eckert, 10777 Berlin, Germany, http://www.in-berlin.de/User/nostromo/ ISO 8859-1: Ä=Ae, Ö=Oe, Ü=Ue, ä=ae, ö=oe, ü=ue, ß=sz. "(Technobabbel)" (Jetrel) - "Müssen wir uns diesen Schwachsinn wirklich anhören?" (Neelix) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991111010837.C48604>