Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 12:17:32 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow <token@wuff.mayn.de> To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>, Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>; from Forrest W. Christian on Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 10:58:14AM -0700 References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911251001220.27351-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Forrest W. Christian wrote: > -current (all the latest greatest experimental). > -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff). > -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug >fixes after release). Hmm... wouldn't that degrade -stable and disqualify it for applications that are mission critical and for which it would be well suited? People would probably be very confused and ask why something that isn't mission critical is tagged "stable". mkb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991126121732.B27425>