Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:57:57 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, eivind@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bitkeeper license review Message-ID: <19991202135757.D18855@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912012157080.22013-100000@beppo.feral.com>; from mjacob@feral.com on Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 09:58:09PM -0800 References: <12389.944103209@brown.pfcs.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912012157080.22013-100000@beppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Harlan Stenn wrote: -On [19991202 07:00], Matthew Jacob (mjacob@feral.com) wrote: >> Anybody here have the time/inclination/ability to review a *draft* of the >> proposed BitKeeper license to see if it would be acceptable for use by >> FreeBSD? >Since Larry's a neighbor and buddy of mine, I can look at it, but not >until next week (poke me if to do so if it hasn't been done already). I >already offered to him to do the port for *BSD, but he's a new dad and >busy and didn't really get back to me... Sorry to say, but BitKeeper is severely braindead. They chose to built on top of SCCS, which in itself is nearly useless. Also he has some weird ideas about versioning which I certainly don't agree on. We use CVS at this moment, stepping towards BitKeeper from CVS is a step backwards. Eivind and me are trying to get a new version control system of the ground which will kick arse on several accounts. Unfortunately work draws us in. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <asmodai@bart.nl> bART Internet Services / Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991202135757.D18855>